Book Information
Law of Disclosure : A Perennial Problem in Criminal Justice
Series Title
Routledge Contemporary Issues in Criminal Justice and Procedure
Readership
Postgraduate, Research & Scholarly
Author
Publisher
Publication Date
20201218
Price
$ 180.00
ISBN
9780367420147
Pages
152 p.
Size
156 X 234 mm
Cover
Hardcover
Description
This edited collection explores the topic of disclosure of evidence and information in the criminal justice process. The book critically analyses the major issues driving the long-standing problem of dysfunctional disclosure practice, with contributions from academics, lawyers, former police officers, and current police policymakers. The ultimate objective is to review the key problems at the investigative, trial and post-conviction stages of criminal proceedings, and to suggest a way forward through potential routes of reform, both legal and cultural. The collection represents a significant and novel contribution to the policy debate regarding disclosure, and advances thought on resolving this issue in a fair and sustainable manner. The book provides a valuable resource for academics, practitioners and policymakers working on this vital aspect of criminal procedure.
Table of Contents
Foreword by Prof. Ed Cape p. Introduction Chapter 1 - The Rise of Managerialism: The Impact of Swift and (Un)sure Justice on Disclosure in Criminal Proceedings Dr. Ed Johnston Chapter 2 - Something to work with': Contemporary issues with pre-charge police disclosure and the role of the defence lawyer Stephen Davies and Dr. Ed Johnston with Anthony Edwards Chapter 3 - Changing culture? Thinking differently about police and prosecution disclosure Dr. Tom Smith Chapter 4 - 'Hidden in plain sight': The influence of culture on the police approach to disclosure David Houchin and Nick Caveney Chapter 5 - A Search for New Solutions to the Disclosure Problem: Behavioural and Empirical Perspectives Libby Potten and Fiona McLean Chapter 6 - Uncovering Disclosure Errors: Appeals, Innocence Projects and the Criminal Cases Review Commission Dr Hannah Quirk Concluding Thoughts